Sarah Smith manages the North American Trail Ride Conference from her home office in Filley.
NATRC sanctions long-distance competitive trail rides and clinics for riders of all equine breeds and disciplines in six regions throughout North America. The organization was established in California in 1961.
Smith began in 2016 as the Executive Director and sole employee of NATRC.
âWe promote safety, sportsmanship, education and trail horse care through qualified evaluation of horse and rider by veterinary and horsemanship judges, in a fun, family-friendly environment,â she said. âWe also offer educational events to provide continuing education year-round.â
She noted that she relies on volunteers throughout the six regions in the United States to coordinate rides at 60-70 different venues. Some of those venues host up to three rides during that weekend depending on divisions and different types of competitive rides.
People are also reading…
Smith is responsible for the administration of the organization including oversight of the multiple committees. She sanctions the rides and works with day-to-day operations. Handling insurance and membership functions are another part of her duties.
She has been on several podcasts, done presentations, manages social media and coordinates annual conventions.
Smith serves as a horsemanship judge and has done every volunteer job at one time or another at trail rides. Â
She said that she works as a liaison in work with other organizations. Currently she is working with a team from Patagonia that is looking at the use of equines to bolster recreation and conservation in their area.
âThey are losing trails and because we have so much established work in our sport, they connected with me. Weâre sharing resources and strategizing. Itâs fascinating,â she said.
The United States Marine Veteran said working at home is sometimes challenging.
âItâs a bigger challenge to work at home when my kids arenât in school and whatever they are doing looks way more fun than what Iâm doing,â she said. âBut Iâve done it long enough that I have a solid routine. I know what needs to be done during peak seasons, but it does require some self-discipline.
âOn the flip side, I like the flexibility that working at home offers. How many people get to turn their childhood passion and hobby into a career.â
Smith started riding horses when she was 6 years old. She started competing with NATRC when she was 10.
âThen it was 10 years old before a junior could compete in a ride. Now itâs 8 years old,” she said. “A month after my 10th birthday I rode at Rock Creek Station in my first competition.”
She said her parents were not horse people, but a woman who worked with her dad had given Smith her first horse.
âJoyce Jensen gave me my first mare, Nici, and introduced me to Nebraska Endurance and Trail Ride Association (NECTRA). She took me to all the meetings, fun rides and eventually competitive rides,â she said. âThatâs how I met Chuck Edwards.â
In September, Smith served as the Ride Manager for the NATRC Indian Cave State Park ride. While she has served as the manager approximately eight times, this year marked the 50th anniversary of the ride being held in the park.
It is the longest continuous occurring ride on the same trails in NATRC.
Smith served as the ride manager as a personal favor to Chuck Edwards who was one of the three founding members of the Indian Cave trails and ride. She said Edwards was her âNATRC dad.â
She recognized Edwards during a special celebration at the ride.
âThe club wanted a special way to commemorate the 50th Anniversary ride and Edwardsâ years of dedication,â she said.
A mounting block with a permanent plaque was placed near the shelter in the horse campground at Indian Caves State Park.
A portion of the plaque reads:
âIn the spring of 1973, Chuck Edwards, Bill Wicklund and Al Otton along with the Park Superintendent Larry Cook began establishing the Indian Cave State Parkâs Trail System. Using topographic maps and following wildlife trails, the men began clearing and widening the trails with hand tools and surveyor tape to make them equine and people accessible. Later, larger equipment was used for mowing down thick brush and pushing back the edges. A few new trails have been added over the years but most of them branch off from the originally laid trails. âThink of these modern explorers as you ride along in their footsteps and dreams and thank them for the beautiful opportunity we enjoy in hills of Indian Cave.â
Edwards said the friends that helped him were no longer here.
âThe other two that helped with this â theyâre no longer here and they were good friends,â he said. âWe worked together and never had an argument to get this park cleaned up. They had to walk the trails. Nobody could love this park any more than I could from the first time we came down here. I fell in love with this park.â
Smith has 5,430 competitive miles in NATRC. She has ridden 200 competitive miles with the American Endurance Ride Conference. One hundred of those miles were in the 24-hour / 100-mile Tevis Cup ride in 2018.
She noted that this was more than a job.
âI would never have been able to do the Tevis Cup ride without my experience in NATRC and without the many people Iâve met along the way that have become friends and support,â she said.
Smithâs daughter, Ruby, is 12 years old and has been competing with NATRC for two years.
For more information on becoming involved with NATRC visit www.natrc.org.
Stuck in solitary: Nebraska teens increasingly locked in âroom confinementâ despite state law meant to limit it
Nebraska lawmakers reject bill to make daylight saving time permanent
Nebraska judge: State did not ‘willfully’ violate order to pause return-to-office mandate
UNL student shares grand prize for translating scroll buried at Pompeii
Nebraska softball’s Jordy Bahl speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 3.
Seniors in these Nebraska counties have the highest Alzheimer’s rates
Alzheimer’s rates by state

State and detailed county-level estimates show vast disparities in the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease based on racial and socioeconomic factors. Older Americans, women, Black and Hispanic Americans, and those with lower education levels are at higher risk for developing Alzheimer’s dementia, according to data from the Chicago Health and Aging Project, on which these estimates were based.
The East and Southeast regions of the U.S. were estimated to have the highest prevalence of Alzheimer’s, particularly Maryland, New York, Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana. In Maryland, nearly 30% of residents are Black, and a slightly higher share of the population is 85 and older compared to national numbersâsubstantial risk factors that earn it the #1 spot.
In addition to a high prevalence of the disease, Mississippi has the highest Alzheimer’s mortality rate, largely due to having the worst-quality health care system in the country, Time reported.
Some of the most afflicted counties are home to Black and Hispanic populations in the South, low-income populations in Appalachia, and older adults in Florida, according to Time. Other studies have found that people in rural areas tend to be underdiagnosed or diagnosed in later stages of dementia, delaying or preventing potential treatments.
Read on to see where in Nebraska has the highest prevalence of Alzheimer’s, ranked by the share of the 65 and over population estimated to have the disease. Initial ties were broken by the number of people estimated to have Alzheimer’s, but some ties may remain.
#50. Platte County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.4%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 700 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#48. Thayer County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#48. Webster County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#45. Antelope County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#45. Colfax County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#45. Jefferson County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#44. Madison County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 700 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#43. Wheeler County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.6%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: Not available
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#39. Boyd County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.6%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#39. Franklin County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.6%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#39. Johnson County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.6%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#39. Morrill County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.6%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#35. Garden County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#35. Nance County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#35. Perkins County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#35. Sherman County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#34. Pierce County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#33. Custer County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 300 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#32. Gage County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 500 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#30. Dodge County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 800 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#30. Scotts Bluff County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 800 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#29. McPherson County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.8%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: Not available
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#28. Gosper County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.8%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#26. Cherry County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.8%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#26. Fillmore County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.8%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#25. York County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.8%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 300 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#24. Otoe County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.8%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 400 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#22. Frontier County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.9%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#22. Kimball County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.9%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#21. Sheridan County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 11.9%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#20. Hayes County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.0%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: Not available
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#19. Nuckolls County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.0%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#18. Red Willow County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.0%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 300 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#17. Brown County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.1%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#14. Burt County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.1%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#14. Dawes County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.1%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#14. Richardson County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.1%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#13. Garfield County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.2%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#12. Wayne County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.2%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#11. Knox County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.2%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 300 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#10. Sioux County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.3%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: Not available
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#9. Cedar County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.3%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#8. Keya Paha County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.4%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: Not available
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#7. Pawnee County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.4%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage points of the estimate.
#6. Chase County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#4. Boone County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#4. Phelps County (tie)

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.5%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#3. Cuming County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.7%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 200 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.6 percentage pointsâor 50 peopleâof the estimate.
#2. Greeley County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 12.9%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 100 people
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
#1. Hooker County

– Share of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: 13.9%
– Number of 65+ population with Alzheimer’s: Not available
*These are estimates; actual values have a 95% likelihood of being within 0.7 percentage points of the estimate.
This story features data reporting by and writing by Paxtyn Merten and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.